Supply Chain - Designers - Hydraulic Modelling

Essex and Suffolk Water, part of Northumbrian Water Ltd, supplies drinking water to 794,000 properties. Maintaining a supply to those customers requires the distribution of up to 670 Ml/d of high-quality drinking water. In Essex, the two primary treatment works are Hanningfield WTW, a physio-chemical works near Chelmsford and Layer WTW, a biological works, near Colchester. These are supplied by raw water stored in two large reservoirs at Abberton and Hanningfield. In 2016, and more recently in 2022 low levels of rainfall and hot weather compromised the raw water quality in Abberton Reservoir which led to significant challenges to the biological process at Layer WTW. This meant unprecedented demand was placed upon the chemical works at Hanningfield WTW, which in turn drew down the water level in Hanningfield Reservoir to levels not seen since the summer of 1996.

The challenge

Whilst this low water level at Hanningfield Reservoir was observed, the level in Abberton was healthy due to the process constraints of the biological works at Layer. To mitigate the scenario of having two reservoirs, one relatively full, and another extremely low, occurring in the future, Northumbrian Water applied for enhancement funding in AMP7 to construct a 20km pipeline between Layer WTW and Langford WTW, also a physio-chemical works, where water from Abberton could be reliably treated. This in turn would allow water from the River Chelmer and River Blackwater that would normally be treated at Langford, to augment the water level in Hanningfield Reservoir by utilising existing transfer pumping facilities between Langford and Hanningfield Reservoir. Providing this connectivity, albeit by substitution, will allow Northumbrian Water to balance the water levels in both Abberton Reservoir and Hanningfield Reservoir, and mitigate a potential scenario where no water is available to supply Hanningfield WTW.

The project

In 2019 Essex & Suffolk Water teams began to plan a pipeline route between Layer WTW and Langford WTW for a pipe that could support flow rates up to 50 Ml/d. This figure was determined as the optimum flow rate to allow balancing of the reservoirs to take place and ensure security of supply when faced with long term drought conditions. The pipeline will take advantage of the capacity and capability of the existing pumping station at Abberton which can deliver up to 255 Ml/d to Layer WTW. The route would begin with a strategic connection into the existing raw water mains that deliver water from Abberton Reservoir into Layer WTW. From this point a route was sought that would allow water to run under gravity conditions to Langford WTW where it would be discharged into two existing bankside storage reservoirs each with a capacity of 35 Ml. The pipeline from Layer to Langford would operate as a gravity main, with the upstream head being set by the pressure in the rising main at the take-off point. With approximately 5 bar of available driving head, the flow out of the pipeline will be controlled by a downstream flow control valve. The pipe sizes have been selected to ensure a positive pressure is available throughout the pipeline and to provide sufficient differential pressure at the outlet at maximum flow.

Hydraulic profile

The hydraulic profile shown below (pipeline pressure is shown in red) extends from Abberton Pumping Station to the outlet at Langford WTW. Chainages are measured back from the Langford outlet (at chainage 0m) and the start of the new pipeline construction is at approximately chainage 20,000m. Note the falling available head due to friction losses along the pipeline and its change in gradient at approximately chainage 12,000m. This change in gradient is due to a change in pipe size which is the result of the pipeline optimisation. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="1200"] Hydraulic profile - Courtesy of Stantec UK[/caption] The direct connection from the pumped rising main to Layer introduced a number of hydraulic complexities. A key issue was the control of transient pressures, particularly associated with a sudden loss of output at Abberton Pumping Station. Existing surge vessels provide robust surge control, however, the addition of the 20km extension to Langford would require careful consideration. The time to close the outlet valve at Langford, particularly following a sudden loss of pumping at Abberton, would need to be sufficiently long to avoid exacerbating transient pressures while a closing time too long would risk depressurising the pipeline and the risk of drawing air into the pipeline. The occurrence of transient air pockets at high points could create further transient pressures if encountered by the initial pressure waves. While these challenges could be largely avoided by separating both pipelines entirely with a break tank, the tank would need to be sufficiently large and elevated to provide the same driving head. The design team are, instead, progressing an optimised solution to avoid these additional capital works through thorough detailed understanding of the problem, careful selection of the control valves and the implementation of a control system that remains simple yet capable of maintaining pressures within acceptable limits.

Ground investigations

To support the design of the pipeline Essex & Suffolk Water has now completed ground investigation work along the route to determine ground and groundwater conditions and help inform excavated material management decisions. The ground investigation work comprised:

• 63 dynamic sampler boreholes up to 6m in depth.
• 11 cable percussion boreholes up to 10m in depth.
• 27 soil resistivity tests.
• Post-installation groundwater monitoring at approximately 12 locations.

This work was completed by Essex & Suffolk Water’s framework partner Allied Exploration & Geotechnics (AEG) in October 2022 based on a specification written by Stantec UK. This ground investigation work will help Stantec to determine the appropriate pipeline material. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="1200"] (left) Ground investigation work and (right) pipe installation - Courtesy of Essex & Suffolk Water[/caption]

Pipe material selection

The use of steel, ductile iron (DI) and polyethylene (PE) were all considered. Due to aggressive ground conditions, appropriate corrosion protection would be needed for ferrous materials. PE would remove the corrosion risk but the large diameters needed and the associated pipe thickness would require careful control of welding during construction. At the time of writing (June 2023), final selection is ongoing but, following initial assessment of cost, constructability and maintenance issues, either an all DI pipeline or a mix of DI and PE are considered most favourable.

Project planning

The project is currently moving through the detailed design phase and one activity that has been conducted concurrently is the liaison with the council districts that the pipeline crosses, both Colchester City Council and Maldon District Council. In the experience of Essex & Suffolk Water, large diameter cross country pipelines have typically required Environmental Impact Assessments to support the planning process. For this project, an alternative approach was taken where the team designed the pipeline and its construction methods, including associated compound areas, to have the least possible impact from a number of perspectives including ecology, visual impact and traffic and transport in advance of submitting our EIA Screening Request. This design, including examples of how measures were introduced to provide a less impactful route than one that may have been presented prior to completing these mitigations, helped support the EIA Screening request. In response to that request both Councils viewed the screening request favourably and allowed the team to complete the work using permitted development rights recognising the efforts of Essex & Suffolk Water to plan and design the least impactful route possible.

Archaeology

Essex & Suffolk Water now plans to complete the archaeological work associated with the project over the summer period of 2023. Throughout the early phase of the project Essex & Suffolk Water has worked closely with AECOM to complete a desk based assessment and then develop a Written Scheme of Inspection. This has now been approved by the council archaeologist and comprises 552 trenches measuring 2m x 30m across a 40m corridor along the 20km pipeline route. This work will be completed over a 16 week period, 8 weeks for the field work and a further 8 weeks for recording and report preparation. Due to the archaeological history in the area it is expected that some archaeological artefacts of interest will be uncovered. This may in turn necessitate further mitigation trenching along the route.

Layer to Langford Pipeline - Supply chain (as of June 2023)

• Principal designer: Stantec UK
• Ground investigation: Allied Exploration & Geotechnics
• Land owner engagement: Savills
• Technical input: Saint Gobain PAM UK
• Archaeology: AECOM
• Pipe installation: Northumbrian Water
• Pipe supplier: Electrosteel Castings (UK) Ltd

Schedule

The installation of the majority of the 20km pipeline will begin in February 2024 in order to complete the work in March 2025, allowing Essex & Suffolk Water’s in house team to complete the installation in one pipelaying season. Work has already commenced on a number of minor road crossings to coincide with the work of other developers in the area and minimise impact on our customers. Work is also scheduled to commence on the directional drill crossing that will be required beneath two main rivers as part of the project, the River Blackwater and the Langford Cut in September 2023.

Located near Maerdy in South Wales, Lluest Wen Reservoir is a Category A Large Raised Reservoir as defined by the Reservoirs Act 1975. The reservoir is impounded by a 200m long, 25m high earth embankment dam across the Rhondda Fach River and currently impounds 1.07Mm³ of water. Construction of the reservoir was originally completed in 1898. Lluest Wen Reservoir is owned and operated by Welsh Water and has historically been used with a smaller, downstream reservoir, Castell Nos for water supply.

Investigation and scope

Following an inspection of the reservoir in February 2018 under Section 10 (3) of the Reservoirs Act 1975, the Inspecting Engineer made a series of recommendations for measures to be taken in the interests of safety (MITIOS). These recommendations included that flows through the spillway chute be modelled under the 10,000 year and probable maximum flood (PMF) conditions, that the performance of the chute arrangement be evaluated in safely conveying the associated flows to aid scoping remediation works and to action any works as necessary to preserve dam safety. The improvement works were statutory and enforceable by the regulating authority Natural Resources Wales. Mott MacDonald Bentley (MMB) was commissioned to undertake the design and construction of the works under Welsh Water’s Capital Delivery Alliance framework. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="1200"] (left) Base concrete pour and (right) the upper spillway - Courtesy of MMB[/caption]

Lluest Wen Reservoir Spillway Remedial Works: Supply chain - key participants

• Principal designer & principal contractor: MMB
• Flow modelling: Mott MacDonald
• Ground investigation: Strata Geotechnics
• Geophysical surveys: Terradat
• FRC works: Concrete Structures & Floors Ltd
• Metalwork: Industrial Pipework Services Ltd
• Diving works: Edwards Diving Services Ltd
• Manholes: Marshalls CPM
• Drainage pipework: Polypipe Civils and Green Urbanisation
• Concrete cutting & drilling: Holemasters
• Concrete supply: Hanson UK
• Scaffolding: Mii Engineering
• Site buildings: Wernick Hire

Flow modelling and spillway design

Prior to the scheme commencing, the existing flood study was reviewed and updated to reflect current industry guidance. A computational fluid dynamic (CFD) model was developed to simulate conveyance of the PMF and 10,000 year conditions. The PMF scenario anticipated flows approaching 100m³/s, with peak velocities approaching 20m/s discharging through the spillway. Outputs from the model indicated that the existing spillway was unable to contain flows arising during each flood scenario therefore representing a risk to dam safety through erosion of the earth fill embankment. An Options Report was prepared to identify possible solutions to remedy the shortfall in spillway capacity. The report considered the following options for remediation:

• Construct a new spillway off-line along a straight alignment.
• Rebuilding the spillway along the existing alignment.

[caption id="" align="alignnone" width="1200"] Armourstone and lower spillway - Courtesy of MMB[/caption]

Preferred option

The preferred option was to re-build the spillway along its existing alignment. This would involve re-lining the upper section of the spillway which had previously been re-built in concrete during the 1960s. Lining would take the form of a 500mm thick reinforced concrete base connected to the underlying structure via a system of dowels. A similar approach would be taken for the downstream section of the spillway following demolition and removal of the historic masonry structure. Through this section, the new spillway base was doweled to a layer of mass concrete provided for global stability. New spillway walls were constructed on the hydraulic left and right hand sides capable of containing the PMF flows having utilised the CFD model to rationalise the wall heights as far as practicable. Additionally, a central training wall was provided through upper and lower sections of the spillway to evenly distribute flows across the width of the spillway and reduce water superelevation at the two changes in direction. The CFD model was also used to extract hydrodynamic pressures which allowed optimisation of the reinforcement within the walls and bases. Global stability checks for bearing, sliding, overturning and seismic were also undertaken to verify the suitability of the design. The new spillway construction would be approximately 200m in length and 15m at its widest point. Additionally, new drainage networks would be provided to the back of walls to control groundwater levels and underneath the spillway base to protect the formation and prevent undermining of the spillway base. At the downstream end, armour stone was provided for scour protection.

Temporary works

A 90-tonne crawler crane was used to provide full coverage of the spillway footprint. In order to access the embankment side of the spillway, it was necessary to construct a number of culverts, embankment and roadway at the downstream end of the spillway to cross the receiving watercourse. The upstream face of the bridge was concreted to prevent erosion and migration of fill into the downstream watercourse. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="1200"] Finished spillway - Courtesy of MMB[/caption]

Design considerations

The gradient at the lower section of spillway approaches a fall of 1 in 2 which presented significant challenges both in terms of pouring and finishing the concrete bases as well as the flow velocities generated within the spillway. Base pours lengths were reduced to 3m and the bays were installed in a hit and miss sequence through this section in order to prevent slumping of the concrete prior to curing. High flow velocities necessitated that the joints be protected with steel plates to prevent scouring of the joint sealant and significant hydrodynamic pressures developing on the underside of the downstream base. Particular care had to be taken to ensure the absence of abrupt deviations across the joints which could invoke cavitation and ultimately lead to concrete degradation. The water level in the reservoir is known for rising quickly during periods of extended or heavy rainfall due to its location. A temporary drawdown of 3m below top water level was initially agreed with Welsh Water and a robust management plan was implemented to prevent the spillway from operating during the construction phase.

Completion

The scheme was mobilised to site in October 2020 beginning with improvements to the access track to the reservoir. Concrete works were scheduled to commence in late March 2021. Following a dry summer, concrete works were completed by January 2022 with landscaping and other finishing works completed by June 2022 whereupon the Qualified Civil Engineer issued the 10(6) certificate ahead of the required October 2022 statutory deadline.

St Augustines Road is a busy thoroughfare in Chesterfield linking the town to Matlock and the south-eastern edge of the Peak District. Lying within the Yorkshire Water (YW) waste catchment area, the road is steep in its nature with gradients often exceeding 7%. Due to the local hydraulic catchment and topography, during heavy rainfall events flooding occurred at the road’s intersection with Derby Road (A6). The flooding lifted manhole covers from their frames which caused significant damage to the highway. It also caused internal and external damage to the surrounding properties. To combat this, mitigation was carried out by Yorkshire Water and Chesterfield Borough Council (CBC), including the implementation of mitigation measures such as non-return air bricks and flood gates, however, this had limited success. CBC also commissioned the construction of a detention basin to the rear of the flooding properties; but again with limited success.

Hydraulic study

As a result of the mitigation’s limited success, a hydraulic study was commissioned by Yorkshire Water. This confirmed the root cause of the flooding was hydraulic overloading of both the foul and surface water sewers. A notional solution was developed by Yorkshire Water which included the upsizing of these sewers, with some form of temporary storage for the foul system to retain flows in a rainfall event. Later iterations of the hydraulic model revealed that improvements to the surface water network would in fact also reduce the frequency of flooding on the foul water network due to interactions between the two systems during storm conditions. In light of this information, in May 2021 Yorkshire Water secured funding to implement a series of significant improvements on St Augustines Road.

Preferred solution

The preferred solution included the construction of a new outfall into the River Rother and the transfer of all flows from the surface water sewer in Derby Road. This would provide a much greater flooding resilience in the existing system. The existing 225mm surface water sewer was to be upsized to Ø750mm along its 320m length. It would then be diverted via a tunnel underneath Derby Road into the wetland area immediately adjacent into the River Rother. Here, a new outfall would be constructed to discharge the surface water sewer into the river network. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="1200"] (left) The preferred option and (right) flooding on St Augustines Road - Courtesy of Galliford Try[/caption]

Constraints and engineering challenges

The preferred solution progressed to detailed design with several technical challenges to be overcome. Several of these challenges were exacerbated by the need to construct the outfall into the River Rother outside of the salmonoid spawning season. An Environment Agency (EA) bespoke Flood Risk Assessment Permit, (FRAP) was required to construct the outfall and all in-channel activities were required to be undertaken before 1 October 2021 in order to mitigate the impact on any spawning salmon. A significant flow rate of up to 0.89m³/s would be discharged into the river during storm events and river scour was a concern. In order to combat the scour on the riverbed and riverbanks, there was a requirement to reduce the velocity of the flow before it interacted with the River Rother, causing excessive turbulence. To achieve this, box culverts were selected due their unique cross section and significant channel width. This slowed velocities down to near 1m/s, which is widely regarded to have negligible effects on turbulence and thus reducing scour. The headwall was also designed to allow flows to enter the River Rother at a 45° angle, as per EA Standard Rules SR2015 guidelines, further reducing the risk of scour on the opposite riverbank and riverbed.

Outfall design

This design however did not come without complications, such as the need to carry out the structural design, build and installation of a bespoke outfall within a few months. BSP Consulting was commissioned to carry out the structural design of the outfall which was to be precast, reducing the need for in situ concrete handling adjacent to the sensitive receptor. Off-site build (OSB) also reduced the construction programme and allowed the headwall to be manufactured concurrently within the determination period of the FRAP. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="1200"] Outfall under construction - Courtesy of Galliford Try[/caption] Poor ground and underfoot conditions adjacent to the River Rother proved too risky and problematic for traditional mobile crane lifts, so all lifts of the precast sections were to be undertaken with a tracked excavator. This further constrained the design and restricted the maximum mass of each section to 13 tonnes. Consequently, in its final iteration the precast headwall was designed in two sections and was combined with an in situ toe and infill slab/wall which completed the structural design.

Design

During the design stages, extensive ground investigation was carried out. This identified water bearing sand and gravel strata adjacent to the river which transitioned to mudstones and clays towards St Augustines Road. It was this change in strata which posed a significant challenge for the no-dig section of the work beneath Derby Road. This section of work was critical as it linked the outfall to the upsizing work on St Augustines Road. Discussions were held with Active Tunnelling Ltd who proposed the use of the guided auger bore technique to install the sewer in this transitional strata. Although initially designed as a 750mm diameter sewer, this was reduced to 600mm which was the maximum diameter which could be accommodated by the tunnelling contractors. Hydraulic modelling was undertaken by RES Environmental to confirm the viability of this proposal and in order to compensate for this localised throttling, the pipeline had to be upsized locally to 900mm immediately upstream of the tunnel. The alignment of the tunnel was severely limited due to proximity of existing buildings on Derby Road. BSP Consulting was again called into action as pre-condition surveys and settlement calculations were commissioned in order to understand the impact of the tunnelling works on these at-risk properties. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="1200"] (left) Installation of drive pit on St Augustines Road, (middle) guided auger bore rig, and (right) the transition between 600mm and culverts - Courtesy of Galliford Try[/caption] Settlement calculations were undertaken using the “Guide to best practice for the installation of pipe jacks and microtunnels technique” and a predicted settlement of <3mm was deemed to be acceptable. The pre-condition surveys highlighted only minor cosmetic issues and were used as reference to the state of repair of the properties prior to construction work commencing. The majority of the civil design was undertaken in house. This element included a design coordination role combining and processing the information received from the consultants and stakeholders. An example of the numerous stakeholders which were consulted is that of the Coal Authority. Initial searches indicated the presence of historical coal workings. More detail was sought and records indicated the presence of an adit within 20m of the proposed pipeline. A coal permit was sought from the Coal Authority and the design progressed whilst this was processed.

St Augustines Road (Chesterfield) Flood Alleviation: Supply chain: key participants

• Principal contractor & civils design: Galliford Try
• Temporary works & headwall design: BSP Consulting
• Hydraulic modelling: RES Environmental Ltd
• Ecological consultants: Middlemarch Environmental
• Traffic management: Amberon Traffic Management
• GRP & utility mapping: Cloud Conversion
• Ground investigation: Grange Geo Consulting Ltd
• Pipelaying & outfall construction: Arthur Civil Engineering
• Trenchless installation: Active Tunnelling Ltd
• Cofferdam design & supply: National Trench Safety UK
• ‘EndSafe’ safety barrier: Groundforce Shorco
• Cofferdam installation: Ivor King Piling
• Dewatering: Alba De-Watering Services Ltd
• Precast concrete: Bonna Sabla
• CCTV, CIPP & cleansing: CPS Drainage Solutions
• Handrailing & grille design: Galliford Try (Fabrications)
• Silt curtain: Murlac Land and Marine Environmental Solutions
• Pumping: Selwood Ltd
• Ridgistorm pipes: Polypipe Civils
• Pipe & flap valve supplier: Keyline Civils Specialists
• Landscaping & site clearance: Landscape Maintenance Services Ltd
• Reinstatement of traffic signals & street furniture: Swarco
• Aggregates & muck away: JC Balls & Sons
• Brickwork: Derwent Joinery & Construction
• Gates & fencing: SFC (Midlands) Limited
• Surfacing: BDS (Yorkshire) Ltd

[caption id="" align="alignnone" width="1200"] Service detection - Courtesy of Galliford Try[/caption]

Installation

The Environment Agency granted the FRAP on 13 August 2021, and the detailed design was finalised and submitted to Yorkshire Water’s technical approval committee on 16 August 2021. Work began on site a few days later, leaving just six weeks to construct the headwall and cease all in-channel activities as per the conditions of the FRAP. Work commenced immediately on the enabling works, with particular attention paid to the temporary works. Haul road To provide drainage to the waterlogged land adjacent to the River Rother, a land drainage scheme was commissioned, designed and installed by Lincolnshire Drainage. This provided a more suitable foundation on which to install the haul road and working laydown areas. The haul road was designed by BSP Consulting and was of substantial construction given the underlying strata, at 700mm thickness with geotextile layers to improve longevity. Ground dewatering After the installation of the haul road, wellpoint dewatering was installed around the outfall area and along the proposed culvert alignment. The dewatering was installed by Alba De-Watering Services Ltd at 1.5m centres. However, due to the underlying mudstone, each well had to be pre-augered and was then installed using the more traditional spout method to ensure that a reasonable well depth was achieved to adequately dewater the working area. A silt curtain was supplied and installed by Murlac Land and Marine Environmental Solutions prior to the channel works to minimise silt and sediment damage downstream from the works. It proved to be very effective during the cofferdam installation. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="1200"] Cofferdam and silt curtain - Courtesy of Galliford Try[/caption] Cofferdam A cofferdam was required to retain the River Rother and this was designed and supplied by National Trench Safety UK and installed by the primary subcontractor Arthur Civil Engineering. The cofferdam was unique in design in that it utilised Larsson piles in a trapezium shape (plan) to minimise over-dig yet still accommodate the headwall and first culvert. The cofferdam was installed by Ivor King Piling using a 35t excavator with a Movax side grip pile driver attachment. The cofferdam was effective but 4” end suction pumps supplied by Selwood Ltd were still required to maintain the cofferdam and keep water levels low. Headwall installation Once the cofferdam was watertight, the headwall toe was cast in situ, after which the precast headwall arrived in two sections as planned. It was lifted into position by Arthur Civil Engineering using a 50t tracked excavator. An administrative issue led to the need to negotiate a 2-week FRAP extension with the EA and the headwall was completed and the cofferdam removed by 14 October in accordance with the conditions of the revised FRAP. Pipeline works Construction works on the remainder of the project continued in March 2022. A temporary one-way system was implemented to provide a safe working area to install the remainder of the pipeline with open cut works commencing on 14 March. The open cut works progressed steadily with over 100 services safely crossed. The later spring and summer months provided excellent conditions for online sewer relay with drought-like conditions, culminating in hosepipe bans for the majority of the UK. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="1200"] Open cut pipelaying - Courtesy of Galliford Try[/caption] Prior to the tunnelling works commencing, concern was raised over the proximity of the tunnel as it crossed under a 225mm foul water sewer in Derby Road. With a clearance of just 300mm, the existing foul sewer was inspected by CPS Drainage Solutions using CCTV and a precautionary 5m cured-in-place patch liner was installed to strengthen the sewer prior to the guided auger bore operation. No-dig works commenced in early June and progressed well without incident and were completed towards the end of the summer. No settlement was detected during the installation and no visual deformations were reported from the nearby structures. Open cut works continued late into the summer with flooding benefits delivered by 5 October. Significant rainfall events have since occurred and the feedback from residents previously affected by the flooding has been positive.

Off-site build

Off-site build was utilised heavily without which it would not have possible to abide by the conditions set in the FRAP and achieve the tight programme when constructing the outfall into the River Rother. The headwall and culvert manhole cover slabs were precast by Galliford Try off site and the hand railing and grille were fabricated by Galliford Try (Fabrications). The flap-valve was fabricated off-site by Keyline Civils Specialists. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="1200"] 900mm Ridgistorm pipe from Polypipe Civils ready for installation - Courtesy of Galliford Try[/caption]

Public engagement & community impact

Throughout the project customer engagement was a priority for Galliford Try and Yorkshire Water. Although COVID-19 curtailed some of the engagement meetings which were planned at the start of the project, regular communication with residents of St Augustines Road and surrounding area took place. A significant quantity of the communication was made to the local residents Facebook group, which provided timely and accurate updates on progress. Traditional letters were also posted as back up and for those who didn’t have access to Yorkshire Water’s online updates. Towards the end of the project volunteers from Galliford Try and Yorkshire Water spent a day helping out at the local food bank on St Augustines Road and made a donation of £500 to assist with their ongoing charitable cause.

Project success

The project is considered huge a success for Galliford Try and is the largest single project completed on the Infrastructure Framework for Yorkshire Water within the AMP7 period.

The Southampton Shellfish Scheme comprises the upgrade to four wastewater treatment works and one combined storm overflow (CSO) discharging effluents to the Solent. The Water Industry National Environment Programme (WINEP) No Deterioration Shellfish Drivers (ND_SW) have dual targets: (i) to reduce the number of intermittent storm discharges to 10 significant spills or less per year (as a 10-year average) for the agglomeration of assets impacting Southampton Shellfish Water, and (ii) for the final effluent discharges, achieve a 6.6 log reduction in E. coli between crude sewage and the boundary of Southampton Shellfish Water. Additionally, WINEP U_IMP5 drivers resulting in an increase in flow to full treatment (FFT) were applicable at some of the sites, therefore design and construction for all drivers were combined under the same project.

Site	Pre-U_IMP5 initial calculated volumes (m3)	Post Post U_IMP5 impact to agglomeration (June 2021) (m3)	Final Volumes (m3)
Millbrook WwTW	Yes	Yes	Yes
Slowhill Copse WwTW	Yes	Yes	Yes
Woolston WwTW	Yes	No	No *
Ashlett Creek WwTW	Yes	No	Yes
Ensign Park CSO	Yes	No	No
Table 1: Southampton Shellfish Scheme drivers		* N/A, but FFT is being increased as a mitigation for ND_SW driver

Southampton Shellfish Scheme sites

The technical solutions considered during design included increasing the storm tank capacity and the hydraulic capacity of the wastewater treatment works (WwTW) to reduce the intermittent storm discharges, with UV irradiation or membranes being considered to achieve the disinfection requirements.

[caption id="attachment_14597" align="alignnone" width="1200"] UV irradiation system at Slowhill Copse WwTW (December 2023) - Courtesy of Southern Water[/caption]

Details of the five sites are as follows:

1. Millbrook WwTW treats for a population equivalent (PE) of 147,000 with biological treatment provided using a 4-stage Bardenpho Activated Sludge Process (ASP).
2. Slowhill Copse WwTW treats for a PE of 77,000 PE and provides biological treatment via a Modified Ludzack-Ettinger (MLE) configured ASP.
3. Woolston WwTW treats for a PE of 70,000 and has an MLE configured membrane bio-reactor (MBR).
4. Ashlett Creek WwTW treats for a PE of 15,000 and provides biological treatment via a sequential batch reactor (SBR).
5. Ensign Park is a combined sewer overflow (CSO).

Modelling & optimisation of storm volumes

The project drivers required a reduction of spill frequency at storm overflows for all the catchments that discharge into Southampton Shellfish Water. This impacted five separate wastewater treatment works catchments.

Early in the design, the Southern Water (SW) project team identified an efficiency opportunity of combining the FFT U_IMP5 (increase in flow to full treatment) Driver with the Shellfish Driver, which had a significant impact on reducing the volume of the storm storage tanks. SW held regular meetings and agreed the approach with the Environment Agency (EA) including alignment of Regulatory output dates to the end of the AMP period.

The assessment of storm storage is based on the agglomeration approach outlined in the EA PR19 shellfish guidance and methodology. The definition of a significant spill was agreed with the EA at the conceptual stage of the scheme. This assessment treated all the discharges as a single agglomeration.

[caption id="attachment_14601" align="alignnone" width="1200"] UV irradiation system at Millbrook (May 2023) - Courtesy of Southern Water[/caption]

In summary, the integrated combined driver approach provided the following benefits:

• Avoided abortive investment:
  • Storm tanks for ND_SW being oversized (increased FFT from U_IMP5 reducing storm flows).
  • UV irradiation system and associated feed pumping for ND_SW being undersized (increased FFT from U_IMP5).
• Reduced carbon impact:
  • By avoiding assets no longer required.
  • By avoiding an inefficient 2-stage construction approach.
• Avoided potential abortive third party land acquisition and development.
• Reduced construction, traffic movements and the impact to the local community, particularly within the urban areas.
• Avoided unnecessary impact to the environment and ecology.
• Avoided potential abortive works for 3rd party infrastructure (for example, power upgrades).

To develop the solutions required at each wastewater treatment works, the sewer network performance for the five catchments was designed using a 10-year rainfall dataset. The observed spill frequencies across the catchment had to be agglomerated to ensure that 10 significant spills or less per year was achieved over a long-term (10 year) average.

This meant the modelling was more complex and took a lot longer than a usual model build and verification exercise because of the need to assess all five catchments together.

Following subject matter guidance from across the industry, the project team used an innovative approach of using an extended rainfall series duration and a single rain gauge. In addition, the team targeted the storage volumes at sites where there was available capacity to arrive at the most efficient storage volumes that were significantly lower than the original estimates, all while complying with good industry practice. In summary, this included:

1. Extending the rainfall series for a longer period than 10 years to be more representative of long-term weather patterns, addressing extremely ‘wet’ periods within the original 10-year series.
2. Using a single rainfall profile as this coastal rain gauge is more representative of the rainfall falling on the main urbanised sections of the catchments.
3. An extended rainfall series to help address the annual frequency, extremeness and year-on-year variability of rainfall patterns and particularly wet or dry periods.

[caption id="attachment_14602" align="alignnone" width="1200"] Storm Shaft in Ashlett Creek (June 2024) - Courtesy of Southern Water[/caption]

Optimising storm storage volumes

The project team considered the best location for increasing the capacity of storm storage considering the cost/benefit for reducing significant storm spills. For example, at Millbrook WwTW redundant storm tanks were utilised that provided a volume of 3,140m³. The increase in volume at Millbrook enabled the storage volumes to be optimised across the agglomeration of sites with volumes being offset against other more constrained sites.

Southampton Shellfish Scheme: Supply chain - key participants

• Client: Southern Water
• Delivery partners & outline/detailed design: GTB
  • Galliford Try
  • Binnies
• UV design & coastal & network modelling: Stantec UK
• Coastal & network modelling: Southern Water
• Civils & pipework: Knights Brown
• Civils & pipework: Impact Formwork
• Storm shafts & tunnelling: HB Tunnelling
• Piling works (Woolston WwTW): Rock & Alluvium
• Piling works (Woolston WwTW): Keller Foundations
• Storm tank remedials: Concrete Repairs Ltd
• Mechanical installation: Bridges Electrical Engineers Ltd
• Mechanical installation: Steelway
• Electrical installation: Field Systems Design
• Electrical installation: Loxton Electrical
• ICA: Total Automation & Power (TAP)
• MCCs: MCS Control Systems
• GRP kiosks: Industrial GRP Ltd
• Penstocks: Ham Baker
• UV: Trojan Technologies
• Membranes: Koch (KMS)

[caption id="attachment_14599" align="alignnone" width="1200"] Refurbishment of redundant storm tanks at Millbrook to provide 3,400m3 capacity - Courtesy of Southern Water[/caption]

Infiltration - optioneering

1. To optimise the significant storage volumes at the works, sustainable catchment opportunities were considered for the large, urbanised Millbrook and Woolston catchments by the removal of specific areas of groundwater infiltration and surface water from foul sewers.
2. The optioneering was undertaken using an optimisation software package to target impermeable areas (roads and roofs) connected to the network and working through simulations (up to 20,000) to assess parts of the catchment where connected roads and roofs could be removed from the foul sewer.
3. The benefit was not as expected when considering the agglomerations due to spills from the other assets. In addition, the timescale to achieve long-term reduction from impermeable area removed or groundwater infiltration would require a multiple AMP period.
4. Future opportunities using the optimisation techniques will be considered for similar CSO and storm spill frequency schemes to achieve sustainable catchment opportunities, by the removal of specific areas of groundwater infiltration and surface water from foul sewers.

Woolston WwTW - increasing FFT

The initial significant storm volumes at Woolston were extremely challenging given the location of the site within an urban environment and lack of available space. The project team identified an opportunity of increasing the FFT at Woolston, which provided a significant reduction in storage. The scope involved utilising hydraulic headroom within the works, and through the installation of additional MBR capacity and associated pump upgrades, enabled a 20% increase in FFT at Woolston WwTW (427 l/s to 534 l/s).

[caption id="attachment_14603" align="alignnone" width="1200"] Construction of the shaft at Woolston - Courtesy of Southern Water[/caption]

The programme to deliver the increase in FFT at Woolston was short and provided an early reduction in E. coli concentration discharging to the Solent. This early delivery reduced 20% of the total E. coli concentration across the agglomeration of sites and was fundamental in agreeing new regulatory dates for the SW_ND (storm storage) drivers. The combination of the integrated driver approach to reducing spills, the innovative modelling and optimisation of assets reduced storage volumes by circa 46,000m³.

The final volumes are as shown in Table 2:

Site	Initial calculated volumes (m3) (pre-U_IMP5)	Post Post U_IMP5 impact to agglomeration (June 2021) (m3)	Final Volumes (m3)
Millbrook WwTW	3,684	200	3,400
Slowhill Copse WwTW	13,678	2,000	2,000
Ashlett Creek WwTW	4,176	1,650	1,650
Woolston WwTW	27,422	13,120	5,000
Ensign Park CSO	3,806	280	280
Blechynden Terrace CSO	5,000	0 *	0 *
Newtown CSO	562	0 *	0 *
Table 2: Southampton Shellfish Scheme storm storage volumes		* Reduction driven by reduced spills in the agglomeration

New final effluent disinfection at Slowhill & Millbrook WwTWs (AMP7 & AMP8):

In response to a number of drivers, the EA has recently revised its approach to design and permitting of UV irradiation systems for the disinfection of final effluent. The aim is to move away from the use of generic assumptions, to follow international best practise with an approach which employs the use of a site-specific data in conjunction with performance validated UV irradiation equipment. This revised approach enables development of a significantly better understanding of performance and limitations on a site-specific basis.

Understanding the variation and impact of key wastewater characteristics on parameters such as UV transmittance and the UV dose-response relationship enables selection of a representative design envelope and minimum target UV dose. This enables the capital solution to be optimised, minimises power usage, operational costs and carbon impact while securing environmental performance.

[caption id="attachment_14609" align="alignnone" width="1200"] UV irradiation system at Millbrook (June 2024) post commissioning/FST under construction and (inset) UV irradiation system at Slowhill Copse WwTW - Courtesy of Southern Water[/caption]

The steps undertaken for the development of the design parameters and permit conditions for the UV irradiation systems at Slowhill and Millbrook WwTWs can be summarised as follows:

1. Coastal/estuary modelling was used to determine the dilution/dispersion factor available from the effluent discharge location to the Shellfish Water boundary. The boundary is due to extend closer to the discharge points in AMP8 (i.e. reducing the available dilution of the final effluent discharges), therefore disinfection targets were evaluated for both AMP7 and AMP8 during design. This enabled the overall system (channels, MCC and power requirements) to be designed with the ability to install the equipment required in AMP7 and accommodate further banks to meet the lower E. coli targets required to avoid abortive and/or extensive additional construction in AMP8.
2. A programme of sampling and analysis was carried out (from April 2020 to May 2021) to collect data on the variation of microbial and sanitary characteristics of the final effluent. The results were compared to the parameters available from historical site data in order to ensure that the sampling was representative of the expected range. Variation in UV transmittance was recorded using online instruments for assessment with flow data to understand their relationship. The UV dose-response relationship for E. coli for the final effluent was developed using collimated beam testwork to determine the target UV dose required to achieve the disinfection targets for permitting for both AMP7 and AMP8.
3. The data was used to develop a range of design parameters that were then used in conjunction with UV suppliers’ performance validation information to determine a range of UV irradiation system configurations. The options were evaluated considering the different levels of resilience, redundancy and risk of non-compliance with the EA’s proposed new permit conditions.

The new UV irradiation systems have been in operation at both sites since Autumn 2023 and are consistently achieving concentrations of E. coli in the final effluent discharges that will maintain the concentration at the Shellfish Water Boundary below the post PR19 target value of 5 cfu/100ml as a geomean.

[caption id="attachment_14600" align="alignnone" width="1200"] (left) Millbrook UV pumping station and (right) MBR cassette capacity being increased in Woolston WwTW - Courtesy of Southern Water[/caption]

Woolston WwTW - working with care

Due to the limited availability of operational land in Woolston, the new storm shaft is being constructed beneath a car park and green area own by Southampton City Council (SCC), the area also had a Multi-Use Games Area (MUGA). The project team and the representatives of the Council engaged in extensive discussions prior to submission of the planning application which ensured a positive outcome for both parties.

From those conversations the project team learnt that the Council had worked to create a low nutrient coastal grass environment in the zone affected by the project. The topsoil had been amended and sown with the current species in previous seasons. Therefore, the agreed approach was to retain the topsoil stored on site and reinstate it at the end of the project, enabling the green area to grow and cover the old disused carpark.

The first activity after site mobilisation was relocating the reptiles that naturally inhabit coastal grass biomes. All areas with long grass that were part of the construction compound had the grass cut in two passes to encourage reptiles to move to nearby unaffected zones. Additionally, the top 100mm of soil was hand excavated with an ecologist carefully moving those reptiles still on site.

SW, working closely with the local Council, has ensured that the pre-existing facilities not only are kept despite the new structures being built, but that they are also improved. The number of parking bays and EV charging points will be maintained with improved access arrangements to avoid unwanted camping vans. The MUGA will be improved so the excessive slope that the old court had is removed and the pedestrian access to an adjacent park is protected with bollards, as previously vans used to park using part of the footpath.

[caption id="attachment_14596" align="alignnone" width="1200"] Landscaping over Woolston storm shaft - Courtesy of Southern Water[/caption]

Progress to date, successes and future phases

The storm tank at Millbrook WwTW and the increase in flow to treatment at Woolston WwTW were both commissioned in July 2022 while the projects to install UV irradiation at Slowhill and Millbrook WwTWs were commissioned in Autumn 2023. In combination, these improvements represent a reduction of 72,500 cfu/s of E. coli being discharged to the Southampton Shellfish Waters, which is more than 60% of the total E. coli concentration reduction when all the projects are completed.

Results from sampling carried out after commissioning have demonstrated that both UV irradiation systems at Slowhill and Millbrook have reliably achieved the target efficacy, with concentrations of E. coli in the effluent post disinfection regularly below 200 cfu/100ml. Additionally, concentrations of E. coli in the final effluent discharge from Woolston have been consistently below 35 cfu/100ml since July 2019, following commissioning of the MBR.

The next key milestones are 31 December 2024, when the new storm tank at Ashlett Creek WwTW will be commissioned, and 31 March 2025, when all the remaining storage and increase in flow to treatment drivers will be completed.

Forming part of Southern Water’s (SW) Hampshire supply region, the Isle of Wight (IoW) is located just off the south coast of England and is divided into two water distribution zones (WDZ), namely IoW North and IoW South. The IoW South comprises major towns of Ryde, Sandown, Shanklin and Ventnor with multiple villages and more remote rural areas forming the wider distribution network. The water sources and distribution systems have been brought together, with their origins being from former smaller localised systems developed in the late 19th century, which were added to in the 20th century as the IoW population grew, to form an integrated system. Today, there are five existing small and medium sized water supply works (WSW) with a combined daily output of 18 ML supplying customers via several small water service reservoirs (WSR). The water distribution network totals approximately 547 km of mains, serving a population of approximately 45,000 people.

Project driver

The Cooks Castle WSR has been identified for replacement based on asset condition and the associated security of supply risks to customers. This project aims to provide a long term solution for storage requirements and enhance the network associated with the removal/replacement of this existing WSR. To validate the need and determine the optimum size, top water level and location of any new WSR, a solution needed to be developed considering a wider, integrated view of water sources, network storage and water distribution now and into the future. The business planning objectives were broadly defined as:

• Create a more resilient water supply network for future generations (Southern Water Network 2030 rationalisation).
• Maintain levels of service to customers and mitigate water quality risks.
• Ensure future growth and proposed new sources can be integrated (Water Resource Management Plan - WRMP) and reduce dependency on the bulk transfer from the mainland via the Cross Solent Mains.
• Increase operational flexibility through optimisation of existing/new assets.
• Improve security of supply to customers (zonal storage provided in line with Southern Water Asset Class Policy).
• Decommission surplus assets to reduce cost of maintenance.

[caption id="" align="alignnone" width="1200"] Figure 2: The planning process developed - Courtesy of Southern Water[/caption]

Optimisation

The Optimatics’ Optimizer^TM tool was used, allowing the team to analyse up to 35,0000 plans (the group of assets the Optimizer chose to test) in a single optimisation run (see Figure 1 - top of page). Optimizer^TM was allowed to generate plans incorporating both new asset options and removing or retaining existing assets. New options tested included a total of approximately 80km of strategic mains in varying diameters, over 20 WSR configurations in five different locations, decommissioning of existing WSRs and associated rezoning, rationalisation of WSWs and provision of new pumping stations. The Optimizer^TM evaluated plans using input ‘design criteria’ which were formulated and aligned with the project planning objectives and Southern Water standards. More complex ‘rule-based adjusters’ were formulated to allow automation of controls and prevent Optimizer from selecting options which conflicted with one another, e.g. to prevent Optimizer’s ability to select multiple sizes of WSR at the same location. The evaluation of these design criteria by the Optimizer^TM produced a cost and performance evaluation for each plan. The best performing plans were then compared with each other on a Pareto curve - see Figure 3. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="1200"] Figure 3: Typical Pareto curve showing best performing plans - Courtesy of Southern Water[/caption] Incorporating environmental performance into the optimisation was a particular challenge. The team approached this by taking the results from a high level environmental feasibility assessment and factoring in WSR and pipe costs proportionally to reflect better and worse performing options. This then carried through into the overall cost/performance results for that plan. In the example, the Pareto curve shows about 216 Optimizer^TM plans (from 30,000) from which 10 plans have been identified as feasible options. The Optimizer^TM tool is very powerful at testing several configurations (plans) based on the given inputs, design criteria and formulations. Review and validation are critical parts of the process, and this involves the team checking outputs (individual plan performance), tweaking inputs (adjusting costs/penalties/formulations) and refining the optimisation until several tangible plans are derived. Figure 4 shows typical age of water results for several WSRs with shortlisted plan 7639, 8142 & 8041 compared against the existing system performance. This demonstrates how the optimised plans can significantly reduce the age of water meeting one of the projects key objectives. [caption id="" align="alignnone" width="1200"] Figure 4: Age of water optimisation - Courtesy of Southern Water[/caption]

Defining outputs: the optimal integrated solution

Taking a short list of tangible plans from the optimisation is a starting point which allowed the team to define the pathway to the final integrated solution. Not all factors can be simply incorporated into Optimizer^TM therefore these external factors need consideration alongside the optimisation outputs to form the final integrated solution. One important factor was implementation of solutions over several AMP cycles and ensuring that staged development did not detrimentally impact on customer levels of service. Similarly, consideration of outage scenarios, e.g. WSW shutdowns and mains bursts were considered outside of the optimisation, then retrospectively tested against the shortlisted network configurations.

The solution

The final integrated solution comprised:

• Network connections to a single rationalised WSW using three input water sources (currently two separate WSW with two sources). This aligns with WRMP and improves IoW drought resilience.
• Removal of seven existing WSRs reducing asset risk through deterioration, maintenance costs and age of water issues.
• Provision of one new strategic WSR providing wider security of supply to several district metered areas (DMAs) compared to current configuration.
• Trunk mains reinforcements and new installation/upgrading of network pumping stations to support strategic transfers from proposed WSWs to WSRs and customers.
• Increased operational efficiency and lower OPEX by considering rezoning, triad periods and exploiting opportunities to modify the current network via simple valving operations.